Poker1 Header

List of hold ’em “Desert” boards




January 20, 2021 | Last update: December 5, 2021
(see changes at bottom)
Note: Mike Caro has shared his method for recognizing hold ’em boards and threats quickly. If you haven’t read that Poker1 entry, consider visiting it now: → GO THERE


My terrain method teaches hold ’em students to identify threats fast. You’ll be able to instantly see what’s possible in conjunction with the board. It works so effectively that I’ve added a workout to the gym in my forthcoming Mike Caro University Campus software (a years-long project incorporating over 50 research and training tools).

You also can use the lists below to identify threats in Omaha high games.

Three threats, four terrains

The system is simple. There are three possible threats: (1) a full house (and four-of-a-kind); (2) a flush (including a straight flush); and (3) a straight.

There are four terrains, with increasing degrees of vegetation, that broadly define any board: Desert when none of the threats exists; Prairie when one exists; Forest when two of the three exist; and Jungle when all three exist at once.

Terrain probability

Often you’ll hear a player say that a board was blank or empty — or use some other similar words. Many times, they’re wrong. There just aren’t that many deserts. Here’s the breakdown.

Total boards: 2,598,960
Deserts: 47,400 (1.82% | 1 in 55 boards | 54-to-1 against)*
Prairies: 1,154,488 (44.42% | 1 in 2.25 boards | 1.25-to-1 against)*
Forests: 1,159,760 (44.62% | 1 in 2.24 boards | 1.24-to-1 against)*
Jungles: 237,312 (9.13% | 1 in 11 boards | 10-to-1 against)*
*Odds and percentages above rounded. Instances exact.

As you can see, only about 1.8 percent of boards are deserts. About 98.2 percent contain a threat of a straight flush, four-of-a-kind, full house, flush, or straight. Even experienced players sometimes overlook these threats when making quick decisions.

Desert conditions

In order to be a desert, a board must have no paired ranks, no three or more cards of any suit, and no three ranks close enough to each other that a straight is possible. This means that if you sort the five different ranks high to low, the third card must be more than four notches lower than the first, the fourth card must be more than four notches lower than the second, and the fifth card must be more than four notches lower than the third. Additionally, if an ace is present, then the fourth card must rank six or higher to prevent a five-high straight.

Worst nut hand

Looking at the last board listed below (#79 — Q-8-7-3-2), we can understand why a pair of queens is the lowest-ranking hold ’em starting hand that can ever be guaranteed a win. When matched with that Q‑8‑7‑3‑2, the five-card hand becomes Q-Q-Q-8-7. No lower hand can ever be “the nuts.”

The list
      ↓ A-K ↓

  1.  A-K-9-8-4
  2.  A-K-9-8-3
  3.  A-K-9-8-2
  4.  A-K-9-7-4
  5.  A-K-9-7-3
  6.  A-K-9-7-2
  7.  A-K-9-6-4
  8.  A-K-9-6-3
  9.  A-K-9-6-2
  10.  A-K-8-7-3
  11.  A-K-8-7-2
  12.  A-K-8-6-3
  13.  A-K-8-6-2
  14.  A-K-7-6-2
  15.   ↓ A-Q ↓

  16.  A-Q-9-7-4
  17.  A-Q-9-7-3
  18.  A-Q-9-7-2
  19.  A-Q-9-6-4
  20.  A-Q-9-6-3
  21.  A-Q-9-6-2
  22.  A-Q-8-7-3
  23.  A-Q-8-7-2
  24.  A-Q-8-6-3
  25.  A-Q-8-6-2
  26.  A-Q-7-6-2
  27.   ↓ A-J ↓

  28.  A-J-9-6-4
  29.  A-J-9-6-3
  30.  A-J-9-6-2
  31.  A-J-8-6-3
  32.  A-J-8-6-2
  33.  A-J-7-6-2
  34.   ↓ K-Q ↓

  35.  K-Q-8-7-3
  36.  K-Q-8-7-2
  37.  K-Q-8-6-3
  38.  K-Q-8-6-2
  39.  K-Q-8-5-3
  40.  K-Q-8-5-2
  41.  K-Q-8-4-3
  42.  K-Q-8-4-2
  43.  K-Q-8-3-2
  44.  K-Q-7-6-2
  45.  K-Q-7-5-2
  46.  K-Q-7-4-2
  47.  K-Q-7-3-2
  48.   ↓ K-J ↓

  49.  K-J-8-6-3
  50.  K-J-8-6-2
  51.  K-J-8-5-3
  52.  K-J-8-5-2
  53.  K-J-8-4-3
  54.  K-J-8-4-2
  55.  K-J-8-3-2
  56.  K-J-7-6-2
  57.  K-J-7-5-2
  58.  K-J-7-4-2
  59.  K-J-7-3-2
  60.   ↓ K-10 ↓

  61.  K-10-8-5-3
  62.  K-10-8-5-2
  63.  K-10-8-4-3
  64.  K-10-8-4-2
  65.  K-10-8-3-2
  66.  K-10-7-5-2
  67.  K-10-7-4-2
  68.  K-10-7-3-2
  69.   ↓ K-9 ↓

  70.  K-9-8-4-3
  71.  K-9-8-4-2
  72.  K-9-8-3-2
  73.  K-9-7-4-2
  74.  K-9-7-3-2
  75.   ↓ K-8 ↓

  76.  K-8-7-3-2
  77.   ↓ Q-J ↓

  78.  Q-J-7-6-2
  79.  Q-J-7-5-2
  80.  Q-J-7-4-2
  81.  Q-J-7-3-2
  82.   ↓ Q-10 ↓

  83.  Q-10-7-5-2
  84.  Q-10-7-4-2
  85.  Q-10-7-3-2
  86.   ↓ Q-9 ↓

  87.  Q-9-7-4-2
  88.  Q-9-7-3-2
  89.   ↓ Q-8 ↓

  90.  Q-8-7-3-2

Those are the 79 board types, ordered by ranks, that are deserts when no flush is possible. If your board isn’t listed and you don’t have the best-possible hand or a very strong one, beware of prairies, forests, and jungles!— MC

Changes
2021-12-05: Added sentence about applicability to Omaha. Added paragraph reiterating percentage of deserts and stating the percentage of non-desert boards.




Boston Marathon poll (Caro blog)
BLOG, Controversy, News
Caro’s lonely opinion about smoking and poker
ALL (newest first), Controversy, POKER, Tells
Fast 2014-09-16: Murder of contemporary music
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), AUDIO AND VIDEO, Controversy, Life, Thoughts, Video
Fast 2014-09-22: Caro proven wrong? Say it ain’t so!
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), Controversy, POKER
Fast 2014-11-29: Atheist billboard misunderstood
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), Controversy, Exclude ads, Life, News
Fast 2014-12-18: Tell Sony to release movie
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), Controversy, Exclude ads, Life, News
I lost my marbles. And then I learned poker.
Controversy, Gambling, POKER
Mike Caro poker word is Cheat
Controversy, Ethics, Life
Mike Caro poker word is Law
Controversy, Online, POKER
More hot, haunting notes from the past
Controversy, Life, POKER, Strategy
Poker players, fellow gamblers: We’re being conned
Controversy, Gambling, Online, Psychology
Poker rules players argue about — but I’m right!
Cardrooms, Controversy, POKER, Rules
So-called “New Poker” is a disgrace
Fundamental poker truth never changes
ALL (newest first), Controversy, General, POKER, Strategy
The crime of gambling + truth about breaking even
Controversy, Gambling, Motivation
Vote: 2012 Olympics opening ceremony (Caro blog)
BLOG, Controversy, Creativity
Why Internet gambling is on the wrong track
Controversy, Gambling, Online, Thoughts
Why jury duty is bad poker (Caro blog)
ALL (newest first), BLOG, Calculation, Controversy, Life, POKER
World Poker Tour makes Monster mistake (Caro blog)
BLOG, Controversy, Tournaments

MEGADEX | “Everything is everywhere!”
Any Poker1 page takes you anyplace you want to go!

Poker1 

Megadex

Poker1 universe —
all in one place.

→ Collections
Special Poker1 groups

Poker1 Megadex tools

— main navigation departments —

Collections

Related groups of Poker1 content

↓ Major collections ↓

Gambling  •  Hold 'em  •  Info  •  Life beyond poker

Poker (all)  •  Poker dictionary  •  Poker psychology

Poker statistics  •  Poker strategy  •  Poker tells

Prediction*  •  Shopping  •  Zone 2*

↓ Tip collections ↓

All*  •  Gambling*  •  Life*  •  Poker*  •  Various*

↓ Contributor collections ↓

Brunson  •  Caro  •  McHaffie  •  Wiesenberg  •  Others*

↓ More collections ↓

Poker1 FAQ  •  Poker-tell videos  •  Review of poker lessons

Sunday sessions*  •  Targeted poker quizzes  •  Tuesday sessions

* Any collection followed by an asterisk ( * ) has no entries yet.

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 everything

Browse alphabetically

 

[a-z-listing display=”posts” post-type=”post”]

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 library

Content in categories

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home




≡ Content above: Poker1 Phase2a specification ≡

Published by

Mike Caro

Visit Mike on   → Twitter   ♠ OR ♠    → FaceBook

Known as the “Mad Genius of Poker,” Mike Caro is generally regarded as today's foremost authority on poker strategy, psychology, and statistics. He is the founder of Mike Caro University of Poker, Gaming, and Life Strategy (MCU). See full bio → HERE.