Poker1 Header


Note: Not at the old Poker1 site. A version of this entry was originally published (1992) in Card Player magazine.

Enhanced in 2014.


One especially profitable way to think about poker is to remind yourself there are only three types of actions you should take. There are assertive actions, defensive actions, and deceptive actions. That’s it.

I know, right now you’re thinking and thinking and it’s beginning to hurt. You’re trying to come up with an exception, but you can’t. You see, my friends, even the psychological warfare you engage in between hands, even that action, should fit into at least one of the big three categories.

Maybe suddenly you remember a play you made against your girlfriend Polly in 1960. You swear that it wasn’t assertive, defensive, or. deceptive. You made that play to save Polly money. It was an action of mercy.

You know what? You’re right. That action — declining to bet, let’s say — was motivated by a reason other than the big three. But you weren’t playing poker! I’m going to repeat this one more time. If you’re playing poker seriously, if you’re playing to win, there are only three categories that your actions fall into. Assertive, defensive, and deceptive. Nothing more.

How to destroy yourself assertively. Let’s talk about assertive actions. This is how many skillful poker players destroy their bankrolls. It’s just pitiful. An assertive action is usually a bet or a raise, but not all bets and raises are assertive.

You might bet after being checked to, hoping your opponent will check again on a later round. Perhaps you’re planning, then, to check and get a free card. Is that action assertive? No, it’s either defensive or deceptive or both.

Two reasons to be assertive. But when you feel a non-complicated urge to be assertive by betting or raising, ask yourself these two questions: (1) Am I trying to build a bigger pot? (2) Am I trying to make my chances of winning the pot more favorable.

If you’re not sure your assertive bet or raise is specifically for one of those two reasons, don’t make it. It’s just that simple. Sure, you can bet to establish an image for later profit — that’s deceptive. But when you’re not forced to push your image, when you’re not setting up a next-round play, then you’re being assertive.

I repeat, every assertive bet must be made either to build a bigger pot or to increase your chances of winning the pot. If you’re about to take an assertive action for some other reason — such as impressing your opponents or because it “feels like” the right time — don’t complete that bet. Monitor yourself, and if you’re betting or raising for the wrong reason, or you can’t think of a reason that fits into the two categories, don’t bet or raise.

You’ll be glad.  — MC

Boston Marathon poll (Caro blog)
BLOG, Controversy, News
Caro’s lonely opinion about smoking and poker
ALL (newest first), Controversy, POKER, Tells
Fast 2014-09-16: Murder of contemporary music
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), AUDIO AND VIDEO, Controversy, Life, Thoughts, Video
Fast 2014-09-22: Caro proven wrong? Say it ain’t so!
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), Controversy, POKER
Fast 2014-11-29: Atheist billboard misunderstood
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), Controversy, Exclude ads, Life, News
Fast 2014-12-18: Tell Sony to release movie
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), Controversy, Exclude ads, Life, News
I lost my marbles. And then I learned poker.
Controversy, Gambling, POKER
Mike Caro poker word is Cheat
Controversy, Ethics, Life
Mike Caro poker word is Law
Controversy, Online, POKER
More hot, haunting notes from the past
Controversy, Life, POKER, Strategy
Poker players, fellow gamblers: We’re being conned
Controversy, Gambling, Online, Psychology
Poker rules players argue about — but I’m right!
Cardrooms, Controversy, POKER, Rules
So-called “New Poker” is a disgrace
Fundamental poker truth never changes
ALL (newest first), Controversy, General, POKER, Strategy
The crime of gambling + truth about breaking even
Controversy, Gambling, Motivation
Vote: 2012 Olympics opening ceremony (Caro blog)
BLOG, Controversy, Creativity
Why Internet gambling is on the wrong track
Controversy, Gambling, Online, Thoughts
Why jury duty is bad poker (Caro blog)
ALL (newest first), BLOG, Calculation, Controversy, Life, POKER
World Poker Tour makes Monster mistake (Caro blog)
BLOG, Controversy, Tournaments

MEGADEX | “Everything is everywhere!”
Any Poker1 page takes you anyplace you want to go!

Poker1 

Megadex

Poker1 universe —
all in one place.

→ Collections
Special Poker1 groups

Poker1 Megadex tools

— main navigation departments —

Collections

Related groups of Poker1 content

↓ Major collections ↓

Gambling  •  Hold 'em  •  Info  •  Life beyond poker

Poker (all)  •  Poker dictionary  •  Poker psychology

Poker statistics  •  Poker strategy  •  Poker tells

Prediction*  •  Shopping  •  Zone 2*

↓ Tip collections ↓

All*  •  Gambling*  •  Life*  •  Poker*  •  Various*

↓ Contributor collections ↓

Brunson  •  Caro  •  McHaffie  •  Wiesenberg  •  Others*

↓ More collections ↓

Poker1 FAQ  •  Poker-tell videos  •  Review of poker lessons

Sunday sessions*  •  Targeted poker quizzes  •  Tuesday sessions

* Any collection followed by an asterisk ( * ) has no entries yet.

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 everything

Browse alphabetically

 

[a-z-listing display=”posts” post-type=”post”]

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 library

Content in categories

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home




≡ Content above: Poker1 Phase2a specification ≡

Published by

Mike Caro

Visit Mike on   → Twitter   ♠ OR ♠    → FaceBook

Known as the “Mad Genius of Poker,” Mike Caro is generally regarded as today's foremost authority on poker strategy, psychology, and statistics. He is the founder of Mike Caro University of Poker, Gaming, and Life Strategy (MCU). See full bio → HERE.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Let's make sure it's really you and not a bot. Please type digits (without spaces) that best match what you see. (Example: 71353)