“Mad Genius” ego damage and the nature of poker
Biographical, Image, Motivation, Psychology
An unpredictable image can make a difference
ALL (newest first), General, Image, Manipulation, POKER, SPOTLIGHT, Strategy
Bad poker science and a disagreement
ALL (newest first), Image, Manipulation, POKER, Psychology, Strategy
Big profit from poker equity
Image, Manipulation, POKER, Strategy
Book (Caro on Gambling) 01. Plodders
Bankroll, Gambling, Image, Motivation
Brunson: Finding the right poker style for you
Entries by others, General, Image
Brunson: If you play tight, keep it secret
Entries by others, General, Image
Brunson: Letting opponents tie their own nooses
Entries by others, General, Image, Manipulation, Motivation, Strategy
Brunson: Pride and poverty
Entries by others, General, Image
Brunson: Proving your poker prowess takes time
Entries by others, Image, Manipulation, Other games
Brunson: When calling doesn’t make sense
Entries by others, Hold 'em, Image
Chip leverage: The poker myth that won’t die
Image, POKER, Strategy, Tournaments
Don’t “go quiet” when you have psychological control
Image, Manipulation, Strategy
Fast 2014-09-14: Belligerent poker opponents
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), Image, Manipulation, Psychology
Great mistakes in poker tells
Image, Tells
How I got 8-5 to call on the river in hold ’em
Hold 'em, Image, Manipulation, Psychology
How intimidation works and fails in poker
Image, Manipulation
How to avoid the poker disaster of going quiet
Image, Manipulation, SPOTLIGHT
Letting poker opponents make their own nooses
ALL (newest first), General, Image, Manipulation, POKER, Strategy
Lies told about psychology in poker
Image, Manipulation, SPOTLIGHT, Statistics
1 2 3 6

Everything is everywhere

Any Poker1 page takes you anyplace you want to go!

Poker1 

Megadex

Poker1 universe —
all in one place.

→ Collections
Special Poker1 groups

Poker1 Megadex tools

— main navigation departments —

Collections

Related groups of Poker1 content

↓ Major collections ↓

Gambling  •  Hold 'em  •  Info  •  Life beyond poker

Poker (all)  •  Poker dictionary  •  Poker psychology

Poker statistics  •  Poker strategy  •  Poker tells

Prediction*  •  Shopping  •  Zone 2*

↓ Tip collections ↓

All*  •  Gambling*  •  Life*  •  Poker*  •  Various*

↓ Contributor collections ↓

Brunson  •  Caro  •  McHaffie  •  Wiesenberg  •  Others*

↓ More collections ↓

Poker1 FAQ  •  Poker-tell videos  •  Review of poker lessons

Sunday sessions*  •  Targeted poker quizzes  •  Tuesday sessions

* Any collection followed by an asterisk ( * ) has no entries yet.

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 everything

Browse alphabetically

 

[a-z-listing display=”posts” post-type=”post”]

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 library

Content in categories

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home




≡ Content above: Poker1 Phase2a specification ≡

MCU poker tip: The number of players dealt in matters

Poker1.com default content graphic

Suppose you’re playing in the dealer position after everyone folds in a 10-handed hold ’em game, leaving just three players. You’re in more danger from the blinds waiting to act than if you were playing in a three-handed game to start with – and you need stronger hands to play profitably.

Most players figure the situation is exactly the same when only three players remain, no matter how many players were originally dealt hands. Although the difference is often slight, that assumption is costly.

Bunching

When many players fold, the cards they threw away probably were weaker than average, leaving higher-ranking cards more likely in the hands of your remaining opponents. I call this the “bunching factor.”

It means that the more players that have voluntarily folded, the greater the tendency for remaining cards to be higher in rank. In lowball games, the opposite is true, though.

Because of the bunching factor, you need to play somewhat more selectively if 10 players were dealt in than if only three were, even though the decisions seem identical. — MC

“Mad Genius” ego damage and the nature of poker
Biographical, Image, Motivation, Psychology
An unpredictable image can make a difference
ALL (newest first), General, Image, Manipulation, POKER, SPOTLIGHT, Strategy
Bad poker science and a disagreement
ALL (newest first), Image, Manipulation, POKER, Psychology, Strategy
Big profit from poker equity
Image, Manipulation, POKER, Strategy
Book (Caro on Gambling) 01. Plodders
Bankroll, Gambling, Image, Motivation
Brunson: Finding the right poker style for you
Entries by others, General, Image
Brunson: If you play tight, keep it secret
Entries by others, General, Image
Brunson: Letting opponents tie their own nooses
Entries by others, General, Image, Manipulation, Motivation, Strategy
Brunson: Pride and poverty
Entries by others, General, Image
Brunson: Proving your poker prowess takes time
Entries by others, Image, Manipulation, Other games
Brunson: When calling doesn’t make sense
Entries by others, Hold 'em, Image
Chip leverage: The poker myth that won’t die
Image, POKER, Strategy, Tournaments
Don’t “go quiet” when you have psychological control
Image, Manipulation, Strategy
Fast 2014-09-14: Belligerent poker opponents
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), Image, Manipulation, Psychology
Great mistakes in poker tells
Image, Tells
How I got 8-5 to call on the river in hold ’em
Hold 'em, Image, Manipulation, Psychology
How intimidation works and fails in poker
Image, Manipulation
How to avoid the poker disaster of going quiet
Image, Manipulation, SPOTLIGHT
Letting poker opponents make their own nooses
ALL (newest first), General, Image, Manipulation, POKER, Strategy
Lies told about psychology in poker
Image, Manipulation, SPOTLIGHT, Statistics
1 2 3 6

Everything is everywhere

Any Poker1 page takes you anyplace you want to go!

Poker1 

Megadex

Poker1 universe —
all in one place.

→ Collections
Special Poker1 groups

Poker1 Megadex tools

— main navigation departments —

Collections

Related groups of Poker1 content

↓ Major collections ↓

Gambling  •  Hold 'em  •  Info  •  Life beyond poker

Poker (all)  •  Poker dictionary  •  Poker psychology

Poker statistics  •  Poker strategy  •  Poker tells

Prediction*  •  Shopping  •  Zone 2*

↓ Tip collections ↓

All*  •  Gambling*  •  Life*  •  Poker*  •  Various*

↓ Contributor collections ↓

Brunson  •  Caro  •  McHaffie  •  Wiesenberg  •  Others*

↓ More collections ↓

Poker1 FAQ  •  Poker-tell videos  •  Review of poker lessons

Sunday sessions*  •  Targeted poker quizzes  •  Tuesday sessions

* Any collection followed by an asterisk ( * ) has no entries yet.

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 everything

Browse alphabetically

 

[a-z-listing display=”posts” post-type=”post”]

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 library

Content in categories

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home




≡ Content above: Poker1 Phase2a specification ≡

Published by

Mike Caro

Visit Mike on   → Twitter   ♠ OR ♠    → FaceBook

Known as the “Mad Genius of Poker,” Mike Caro is generally regarded as today's foremost authority on poker strategy, psychology, and statistics. He is the founder of Mike Caro University of Poker, Gaming, and Life Strategy (MCU). See full bio → HERE.

3 thoughts on “MCU poker tip: The number of players dealt in matters”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Let's make sure it's really you and not a bot. Please type digits (without spaces) that best match what you see. (Example: 71353)

  1. I often wondered why loose players seem to always raise when they are on the button against only the blinds with any two cards. Chances are that one of the blinds has big cards and will call or re-raise.

  2. Hello Mike,
    In reference to using Google+, I just wanted to make sure you are familiar with using TeamViewer in combination with Skype (vocal) for teaching. (You probably pioneered the method, but I don’t know that!)

    I am not really liking Google+, they are snooping around in my Gmail account and recommending I put people I have emailed in a group. BOB

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Let's make sure it's really you and not a bot. Please type digits (without spaces) that best match what you see. (Example: 71353)