Poker1 Header


Note: Not at the old Poker1 site. A version of this entry was originally published (1993) in Card Player magazine under the title “Remote poker via computer! Is it coming to your couch?”


Listen to this. Tuesday, April 20. A bill to legalize horse betting by telephone clears a committee in the California assembly. The vote is 10-to-1 in favor.

Don’t be surprised. Imagine that until now nobody on earth has thought up the concept of formalized wagering. People risk ruin every day; they keep taking chances every day. That’s life. But for some reason, no person anywhere ever proposed that people make bets and compete for money. It never dawned on anyone.

Now imagine that suddenly in May of 1993, a human is bombarded by a brainstorm which he conveys to a friend. Struggling to grasp the enormousness of the idea, the friend mutters, “You mean, we each put up money and whoever wins takes it all? I like the idea. What would you call it?”

“Elbmag, after my grandma.”

“But, what if this idea turns out to be unpopular?” the friend protests. “Then it would be a blotch on your grandma’s reputation. You must disguise the name somehow, maybe spell it backwards.”

“Yes! I must scramble Grandma’s name! But I can’t spell it backwards. Elbmag spelled backwards doesn’t mean anything. How about elmbag?”

Competitive wagering arrives. The friend nods enthusiastically as the concept of wagering comes alive on earth, just in time for the 21St century. Fine. But since you’ve imagined all that, let me ask you a question: Now that elmbagging has been born, will people invent the deck of cards, the dominoes, the dice, and the roulette’ wheels to elmbag with?

No! My friends, if gambling had just now been invented, it would be almost entirely reliant on computers, electronic communication, and spectacular new multimedia environments.

Not long after consulting with my America’s Mad Genius Brain Trust, I predicted that in 50 years — except for nostalgic uses — there wouldn’t be a single traditional deck of cards employed in any major American casino.

The Mad Genius’ odds against passage. That’s this horse-wagering-by-phone bill shouldn’t surprise you. Such betting will happen. So will big-money poker among opponents thousands of miles away, linked by computers.

Unfortunately, the chance for passage of this particular legislation is remote. I make it 17-to-1 against. More and more, though, gambling will resemble the way it would have looked had it just now been invented. Casinos will change, and betting will change. You’ll change, you’ll learn to elmbag, and you’ll like it. — MC

“Mad Genius” ego damage and the nature of poker
Biographical, Image, Motivation, Psychology
An unpredictable image can make a difference
ALL (newest first), General, Image, Manipulation, POKER, SPOTLIGHT, Strategy
Bad poker science and a disagreement
ALL (newest first), Image, Manipulation, POKER, Psychology, Strategy
Big profit from poker equity
Image, Manipulation, POKER, Strategy
Book (Caro on Gambling) 01. Plodders
Bankroll, Gambling, Image, Motivation
Brunson: Finding the right poker style for you
Entries by others, General, Image
Brunson: If you play tight, keep it secret
Entries by others, General, Image
Brunson: Letting opponents tie their own nooses
Entries by others, General, Image, Manipulation, Motivation, Strategy
Brunson: Pride and poverty
Entries by others, General, Image
Brunson: Proving your poker prowess takes time
Entries by others, Image, Manipulation, Other games
Brunson: When calling doesn’t make sense
Entries by others, Hold 'em, Image
Chip leverage: The poker myth that won’t die
Image, POKER, Strategy, Tournaments
Don’t “go quiet” when you have psychological control
Image, Manipulation, Strategy
Fast 2014-09-14: Belligerent poker opponents
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), Image, Manipulation, Psychology
Great mistakes in poker tells
Image, Tells
How I got 8-5 to call on the river in hold ’em
Hold 'em, Image, Manipulation, Psychology
How intimidation works and fails in poker
Image, Manipulation
How to avoid the poker disaster of going quiet
Image, Manipulation, SPOTLIGHT
Letting poker opponents make their own nooses
ALL (newest first), General, Image, Manipulation, POKER, Strategy
Lies told about psychology in poker
Image, Manipulation, SPOTLIGHT, Statistics
1 2 3 6

MEGADEX | “Everything is everywhere!”
Any Poker1 page takes you anyplace you want to go!

Poker1 

Megadex

Poker1 universe —
all in one place.

→ Collections
Special Poker1 groups

Poker1 Megadex tools

— main navigation departments —

Collections

Related groups of Poker1 content

↓ Major collections ↓

Gambling  •  Hold 'em  •  Info  •  Life beyond poker

Poker (all)  •  Poker dictionary  •  Poker psychology

Poker statistics  •  Poker strategy  •  Poker tells

Prediction*  •  Shopping  •  Zone 2*

↓ Tip collections ↓

All*  •  Gambling*  •  Life*  •  Poker*  •  Various*

↓ Contributor collections ↓

Brunson  •  Caro  •  McHaffie  •  Wiesenberg  •  Others*

↓ More collections ↓

Poker1 FAQ  •  Poker-tell videos  •  Review of poker lessons

Sunday sessions*  •  Targeted poker quizzes  •  Tuesday sessions

* Any collection followed by an asterisk ( * ) has no entries yet.

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 everything

Browse alphabetically

 

[a-z-listing display=”posts” post-type=”post”]

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 library

Content in categories

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home




≡ Content above: Poker1 Phase2a specification ≡

Published by

Mike Caro

Visit Mike on   → Twitter   ♠ OR ♠    → FaceBook

Known as the “Mad Genius of Poker,” Mike Caro is generally regarded as today's foremost authority on poker strategy, psychology, and statistics. He is the founder of Mike Caro University of Poker, Gaming, and Life Strategy (MCU). See full bio → HERE.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Let's make sure it's really you and not a bot. Please type digits (without spaces) that best match what you see. (Example: 71353)