“Bad Chief G!” I shouted at the poor stupid dog
Odds, POKER, Tests
Blackjack and poker have slow rolls in common
Odds, Other games, POKER, Strategy
Brunson: No-Limit Confusion
Calculation, Entries by others, Hold 'em, Manipulation
Brunson: The size of a poker game
Entries by others, Odds
Caro’s analysis of Irish
Hold 'em, Odds, POKER, Strategy
Costly poker perceptions
Odds, POKER, Psychology, Tells
Does “running it twice” help or hurt your odds in poker?
Calculation, Odds, POKER, Statistics
Fast 2014-09-19: “Poker Probe +” (testers wanted)
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), Odds, POKER, Products
Fearless predictions from the Mad Genius Brain Trust
Brain Trust, Odds
For Jan Bowman: The theory of betting and calling
ALL (newest first), Odds, POKER, Poker people
FSI — My easy poker profit monitor
Bankroll, Calculation, General
Games you can beat + experts destroying bankrolls
Gambling, Odds, Other games
Index: Poker statistics
Statistics
Lies told about psychology in poker
Image, Manipulation, SPOTLIGHT, Statistics
List of hold ’em “Desert” boards
ALL (newest first), Hold 'em, Odds, POKER, Tables and charts
MCU poker odds (statistical tables)
ALL (newest first), Odds, SPECIAL INFO
MCU poker odds: razz (7-low) improvement
ALL (newest first), POKER, Statistics
MCU poker odds: razz (7-low) starting hands
Odds, POKER
MCU poker tip: Poker’s mathematical myth
Calculation, Tips
Mike Caro poker word is Anyway
Calculation, General

Everything is everywhere

Any Poker1 page takes you anyplace you want to go!

Poker1 

Megadex

Poker1 universe —
all in one place.

→ Collections
Special Poker1 groups

Poker1 Megadex tools

— main navigation departments —

Collections

Related groups of Poker1 content

↓ Major collections ↓

Gambling  •  Hold 'em  •  Info  •  Life beyond poker

Poker (all)  •  Poker dictionary  •  Poker psychology

Poker statistics  •  Poker strategy  •  Poker tells

Prediction*  •  Shopping  •  Zone 2*

↓ Tip collections ↓

All*  •  Gambling*  •  Life*  •  Poker*  •  Various*

↓ Contributor collections ↓

Brunson  •  Caro  •  McHaffie  •  Wiesenberg  •  Others*

↓ More collections ↓

Poker1 FAQ  •  Poker-tell videos  •  Review of poker lessons

Sunday sessions*  •  Targeted poker quizzes  •  Tuesday sessions

* Any collection followed by an asterisk ( * ) has no entries yet.

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 everything

Browse alphabetically

 

[a-z-listing display=”posts” post-type=”post”]

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 library

Content in categories

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home




≡ Content above: Poker1 Phase2a specification ≡

MCU poker tip: Aggression in the blinds

With all but the most powerful of hands, you always can justify just calling, rather than raising, when you're in a blind. Remember that you will be in poor position throughout future rounds of betting (except if you're the big blind against only the small blind). If you’re in the small blind against the big blind heads-up, raising is usually correct. But even then, you won’t sacrifice much by just calling.

This poor position on future betting rounds means you have less of an advantage than it may seem. And that makes a raise questionable.

Forced

Also, when you're in a blind, it costs you less voluntary money to call than it costs other players. Remember, you already have entered a significant portion of the bet. You were forced into doing it by the rules.

This means you're often getting a good deal to call, based on pot odds (the amount in the pot versus the amount it costs to call). But when you raise, the proportion of the money you've already blinded becomes less significant, and your pot odds diminish.

For instance, in a limit game, suppose a late position player is the only one to raise your $10 blind to $20. The $5 small blind folds. Now, if you call the $10 raise, you’ll be pursuing the $35 already in the pot (the raiser’s $20, the small blind’s $5, and your $10 big blind).

At this stage of betting, you’re getting $35 to $10 to call, which is 7-to-2 pot odds. But if you reraise and the opponent just calls, you will have risked an additional $20 in pursuit of $45. That’s only 2.25 to 1 (or 4.5 to 2).

Be cautious

It’s important to realize that there are many hands that could make money at 7-to-2 odds (the same as 3.5 to 1), but not at the reduced (2.25 to 1). So, you should be cautious of deliberately reducing your own pot odds to the extent that a hand becomes unprofitable. You should also be concerned that, even if the hand is still profitable after you raise, you might average less profit.

So, if you’re in a blind position, remember this. Whether the game is limit or no-limit, it's hard to justify reducing pot odds with marginally strong hands when you'll have poor position on future betting rounds.

Although you can make exceptions when you’re trying to establish or maintain a dominant image, you should usually stick to this blind-position advice: When in doubt, just calling is safer and often more profitable. Do that. — MC

“Bad Chief G!” I shouted at the poor stupid dog
Odds, POKER, Tests
Blackjack and poker have slow rolls in common
Odds, Other games, POKER, Strategy
Brunson: No-Limit Confusion
Calculation, Entries by others, Hold 'em, Manipulation
Brunson: The size of a poker game
Entries by others, Odds
Caro’s analysis of Irish
Hold 'em, Odds, POKER, Strategy
Costly poker perceptions
Odds, POKER, Psychology, Tells
Does “running it twice” help or hurt your odds in poker?
Calculation, Odds, POKER, Statistics
Fast 2014-09-19: “Poker Probe +” (testers wanted)
ADDED FAST, ALL (newest first), Odds, POKER, Products
Fearless predictions from the Mad Genius Brain Trust
Brain Trust, Odds
For Jan Bowman: The theory of betting and calling
ALL (newest first), Odds, POKER, Poker people
FSI — My easy poker profit monitor
Bankroll, Calculation, General
Games you can beat + experts destroying bankrolls
Gambling, Odds, Other games
Index: Poker statistics
Statistics
Lies told about psychology in poker
Image, Manipulation, SPOTLIGHT, Statistics
List of hold ’em “Desert” boards
ALL (newest first), Hold 'em, Odds, POKER, Tables and charts
MCU poker odds (statistical tables)
ALL (newest first), Odds, SPECIAL INFO
MCU poker odds: razz (7-low) improvement
ALL (newest first), POKER, Statistics
MCU poker odds: razz (7-low) starting hands
Odds, POKER
MCU poker tip: Poker’s mathematical myth
Calculation, Tips
Mike Caro poker word is Anyway
Calculation, General

Everything is everywhere

Any Poker1 page takes you anyplace you want to go!

Poker1 

Megadex

Poker1 universe —
all in one place.

→ Collections
Special Poker1 groups

Poker1 Megadex tools

— main navigation departments —

Collections

Related groups of Poker1 content

↓ Major collections ↓

Gambling  •  Hold 'em  •  Info  •  Life beyond poker

Poker (all)  •  Poker dictionary  •  Poker psychology

Poker statistics  •  Poker strategy  •  Poker tells

Prediction*  •  Shopping  •  Zone 2*

↓ Tip collections ↓

All*  •  Gambling*  •  Life*  •  Poker*  •  Various*

↓ Contributor collections ↓

Brunson  •  Caro  •  McHaffie  •  Wiesenberg  •  Others*

↓ More collections ↓

Poker1 FAQ  •  Poker-tell videos  •  Review of poker lessons

Sunday sessions*  •  Targeted poker quizzes  •  Tuesday sessions

* Any collection followed by an asterisk ( * ) has no entries yet.

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 everything

Browse alphabetically

 

[a-z-listing display=”posts” post-type=”post”]

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home

Poker1 library

Content in categories

A-to-Z     Library     Collections     Top     Home




≡ Content above: Poker1 Phase2a specification ≡

Published by

Mike Caro

Visit Mike on   → Twitter   ♠ OR ♠    → FaceBook

Known as the “Mad Genius of Poker,” Mike Caro is generally regarded as today's foremost authority on poker strategy, psychology, and statistics. He is the founder of Mike Caro University of Poker, Gaming, and Life Strategy (MCU). See full bio → HERE.

One thought on “MCU poker tip: Aggression in the blinds”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Let's make sure it's really you and not a bot. Please type digits (without spaces) that best match what you see. (Example: 71353)

  1. I notice that the worst mistakes are usually made from the blinds. Many players simply do not understand the math involved and others defend their blinds so vigorously that they dump a bunch of money each round. As usual, Mike makes some very valid points.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Let's make sure it's really you and not a bot. Please type digits (without spaces) that best match what you see. (Example: 71353)