Mike Caro poker word is Winners


Note: Not at the old Poker1 site. A version of this entry was first published (2007) in Poker Player newspaper.


Recently, I held a contest. In sifting through my old files, I had discovered an unfinished lecture. The object of the contest was to finish it, using 250 or fewer words.

The concept covered by the unfinished lecture is one that I’ve discussed many times: Why it’s okay to just call, rather than raise, when you’re the small blind. So, in presenting the rules, I said that winners would be decided by what pleases me and I added, “Criteria considered will most likely be clarity of argument, consistency with my own teachings (unless your submission convinces me otherwise), writing competence, and creativity.”

I guess you could say that’s unfair. I wasn’t really looking for arguments contrary to what I have been teaching for years. Oh, well. Right now, I’m going to repeat the transcript of my unfinished lecture. Then I’m going to show you the winning entries.

The unfinished lecture: Just calling in the small blind

One of the worst things you can do is routinely raise from the small blind position. I’m not saying you should never raise, but if you do it very often, you’re eating away at your bankroll.

And I’m not talking about just hold ’em. I’m talking about Omaha high, Omaha high-low, Lowball, and whatever other poker games use the traditional blind structure in the future. That’s the structure where the small blind is immediately to the left of the dealer position and the big blind is two seats to the left of the dealer position.

Keep in mind that blind bets serve the same purpose as an ante. They guarantee that there will be money in the pot before the voluntary action begins. Without blinds or antes, there would be no reason to bet or call with anything other than a perfect hand, and poker among logical opponents would come to a screeching halt. In order for poker to be poker, there must be something in the pot worth fighting over before the action begins. So, now let’s look at a standard game of hold ’em – although, remember, today’s advice applies to all poker games using the traditional blind method.

Pre-established bets

It’s a $20 and $40 game, meaning the first two betting round have pre-established bets and raises of $20 and the final two betting rounds have pre-established bets and raises of $40. Fine. How do the blinds work in these games. Typically, the small blind, to the left of the dealer position puts in about half the amount of a full first-round bet and the big blind, two seats to the left of the dealer position puts in the full bet. Sometimes the size of the blind varies and isn’t exactly half. That’s because some games use chips where dividing the amount of the big blind in half is impractical. In these cases the small blind usually puts in an amount that is as close to half a big blind as possible without using chips that are unusual to the game. Therefore, in a $75 and $150 game, the big blind is obviously $75, but since $25 chips are used, there isn’t an easy way for the small blind to put in $37.50, half the big blind, so either $25 or $50 becomes the norm – usually $50, just more than half.

This is important, because the larger the small blind is in relation to the large blind, the less difference it takes to complete a call, and the more valuable it is for the player in the small blind to make up that difference by calling.

Now I’m going to tell you the most important thing you can ever learn about playing the small blind: You should usually just call if you have a playable hand, even a fairly strong one. Even if you have a pair of aces to start with in hold ’em, you should often consider just calling. You’ll usually overrule this consideration and decide to raise, but a call isn’t out of the question. An exception would be if you have a pair of aces and there are at least two other callers already involved in the pot or if the lone caller came from a late position, making your raise seem like a natural power play, whether or not you have a strong hand. Then you should almost always raise.

Let’s examine exceptions first, then I’ll tell you why you should routinely call in the small blind.

Abrupt ending

That’s where it abruptly ended.

This entry from Alan Nakamura might have won, and I want you to see his poem, but it’s a few too many words, by my count, even if I allow hyphenated combined words, plus SB (“small blind”), and BB (“big blind”) to count as a single words.

Non-qualifying, honorable mention entry

Alan writes:

In poker as in war,

the high ground rules the low,

so those in top position are,

beating those below.

The SB’s down payment,

makes calling laudable indeed,

but raising is tantamount,

to foolishness or greed.

The SB is Blind,

because it cannot see,

the acts of all the others,

before IT acts initially.

The BUTTON sees the weakness such,

that it can win with nothing to reveal,

but SB’s raising sets up nothing much,

because IT has no chance to steal.

On the other ‘hand’, please understand,

there is compensation in a call –

for when you hit your hand,

a check-raise can beat them all!

A call begets a lesser chance of pain,

and greater power to deceive –

what is lost in immediate gain,

can in later rounds achieve.

So just pay the current fare,

and wait for cards to come –

just because the Blind can read Braille,

doesn’t mean IT’s deaf & dumb.

Don’t neglect to raise some

hands like big pairs when many come a-callin’,

or when short-handed and the Blinds become,

of greater value than deception.

And to mix up play of hand,

fold a few in passing –

for not every hand is grand,

and not worth the backing.

So if you find yourself raising in the red,

while playing in the Small,

grab your cellphone instead,

and force yourself to call.

When confronted with the raising choice,

a rule-of-thumb I opine:

“Raise your child, blood pressure, or your voice,

but not your Small Blind.”

Thanks, Alan. Great submission! Also ineligible, because he’s a Poker Player columnist, is one of my favorite poker people, George “The Engineer” Epstein. (Entry not shown here.)

Third place

Third place (wins Caro’s Professional Poker Tells DVD) is John Standiford. He wrote:

The key words to remember are: limit and position.  In addition to the

mandatory half bet, the small blind is forced to act first in every

betting round.  Moreover since it is a limit game, the small blind is

unable to size a bet to the point to chase away potential competition.

The unfavorable position limits your options in the next three betting

rounds.

Acting first is an especially precarious position in a multi-way hand.

With limited bets, simple odds will compel others to stay in the pot to

have the chance to improve their holdings.  The exception, already

mentioned in this lecture, is with limited callers.  Should everyone

fold back to you without a call or raise for a “battle of the blinds” or

if only one caller participates, then take the initiative and raise but

only with a strong hand.

Calling is a much better approach in the small blind because of

subsequent actions.  Calling ensures that you don’t bring attention to

your hand and should the flop hit you correctly, you could be in

position to either attack via a check-raise or by betting out.  If you

raise pre-flop and if you hit a favorable flop your options are limited.

If you bet, you likely will get few callers if any, if you check the

chances are that your competitors will check behind you hoping to catch

a free card on the turn that might convert your post-flop dream into a

showdown nightmare.

Thanks, John.

Second place

Second place (wins signed hard copy, special MCU edition of Caro’s Book of Tells – The Body Language of Poker, plus Caro’s Professional Poker Tells DVD) is Anthony de Jesus. Here’s his entry:

In exceptions such as the pair of aces, you have a robust hand that

is happy to show strength because it is unlikely to fear most

flops.  If there is a single late-position limper who is showing

weakness, then you often want to raise to take the initiative in the

hand and knock out the big blind just as you would any other time

when raising will allow you to win with a bluff when you miss the flop.

But often, if you have a playable hand such as two big cards or a

medium pair, you don’t want to raise, even if you probably have the

best hand.  On the flop, you will be first to act.  If you raised

before the flop, you will often bet the flop.  When you miss the

flop, you will often lose more bets than if you had just called

because you feel obligated to bluff, sometimes on multiple

streets.  When you hit the flop, you will often win fewer bets than

if you had just called because your opponents fear you have a good

hand.  An opponent may throw away an ace with a small kicker on the

flop if you raise before the with ace-jack, but call you down if just

call in the small blind.  You also lose the opportunity to protect

your hand with a check-raise and charge players two bets in some

cases in a large field.

Thanks, Anthony.

First place

And first place (wins a collector copy of the hard cover, signed and numbered, special edition of my Book of Tells, plus the related) is TDLKING. Here’s the winning entry:

In the small blind, the only raises that I consider are isolation and

value raises.

Isolation bets occur when you have a “maniac” in late

position who raises a majority of hands.  If he raises prior to your

turn, re-raising with a strong hand and forcing the big blind and

limpers to face two bets could put you in a favorable position, heads-up

against his “random hand.” I assume you have a tight image and your

opponents are not serial calling stations.

Value raising from the small blind can only be done with AA,

KK and maybe QQ.  Before doubling my pre-flop investment out of

position, I want to have over a 50% chance of flopping at least an

overpair.  With three loose limpers in an unraised pot, I might raise

from the small blind with AK suited as my odds of flopping top pair now

exceeds my number of opponents.

All other raises from the small blind have two negative

effects.  By increasing the size of the pot, they give you and your

opponents sufficient odds to draw and put “Lady Luck” in charge of the

hand.  Against two opponents, your small blind raise puts six small bets

in the pot pre-flop.  That’s makes calling a bet on the flop correct for

many draws for both you and your opponents making you a “dog” to an

opponent betting with top pair and giving draws and chance to make their

hand on the turn or river bleeding your bankroll.

Thanks, TDLKing.

Agree?

Although I don’t agree with everything our contestants said, you get the idea. Don’t let anyone say you must either raise or fold when you’re in the small blind

That common advice doesn’t hold up against careful analysis. It’s perfectly okay to call. Do it often. — MC

Published by

Mike Caro

Visit Mike on   → Twitter   ♠ OR ♠    → FaceBook

Known as the “Mad Genius of Poker,” Mike Caro is generally regarded as today's foremost authority on poker strategy, psychology, and statistics. He is the founder of Mike Caro University of Poker, Gaming, and Life Strategy (MCU). See full bio → HERE.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Let's make sure it's really you and not a bot. Please type digits (without spaces) that best match what you see. (Example: 71353)