“Added Fast” purpose: Allow Mike Caro to post spontaneous thoughts, tips, and information.
- Includes Mike’s notes to himself.
- Titles begin with “Fast,” plus date.
- If expanded later, link is at bottom.
Is Drudge reading Poker1? After I posted this, the DrudgeReport.com headline changed to “America on a coin toss”, mirroring what I wrote below. I know, that’s just a coincidence and the issue was already mentioned in a few places. But you never know, right?
It’s 9 a.m. Central time on February 2, 2016. And if you bet that Bernie Sanders would defeat Hillary Clinton in the Iowa caucuses last night, you got screwed.
While there may still be some final results and adjustments to come, right now Sanders won 695 delegates to Clinton’s 694. The popular vote isn’t announced by the Democrat leadership that oversees the process, but it’s pretty likely that Sanders won that. Anyway, it seems as if this was a very close win for Sanders.
By the way, I didn’t favor either candidate, nor did I make any bets on the outcome.
The media is announcing a “razor thin” victory for Clinton. Why? Because six of the delegates were chosen by coin flip after ties were declared. (There’s no secret ballot on the Democrat side of the caucuses, only head counts.) Guess what? Clinton won all six coin flips (63-to-1 against), pushing her total to 700 delegates so far to Sanders’ 695.
The real result looks like 695 to 694 with six ties — in favor of Sanders. As I said, results could still change, but if it ends like this and you bet Sanders, you have a right to grumble.
I heard one commentator say that even if Sanders had won half of the six coin flips, that would have only been a gain of three more delegates and he still would have lost? WTF? If Sanders had won three of six, his one-delegate lead would not have changed.
— MC | Follow-up link: → None
↓ Scroll down to read or add comments ↓