This helps me play better poker!

When I'm discouraged, this horse race video prepares me to win again.


≡ GO THERE ≡

See my new poker pals…

I moved to the Ozarks to be a hermit. But I didn't expect this. Cows?


≡ GO THERE ≡

Talk


Registration isn't required to post.

Just enter a screen name.

Please follow our guidelines and report abuse.


This is a small Poker1 family meeting place. You may talk about content found on this site — or anything else.

Please speak the way you would to guests in your home. Let's leave hostility and unfounded accusations to other forums.

By posting, you agree that both you and I may use your words without restriction.

Welcome to Poker1 Talk. — Mike Caro


 
Current User: Guest
Search Forums:


 






Wildcard Usage:
*    matches any number of characters
%    matches exactly one character

Sit & Go, 6 player vs. 9/10 player

Post

Warren

9:05 pm December 6, 2011

 
1

Lately I've been playing some 6-player. The top 2 spots finish in the money. 9 or 10 player has the top 3 spots finish in the money. So based on that information alone, which is better?

For 6-player, 1/3 win (2 out of 6). Ditto for 9-player (3 out of 9). It seems that 10 player is a loser (30%) compared to the other 2. Unfortunately, most of the Sit & Go I run into are 10 player.

And what of double or nothings? They are a standard 10-player in which 5 players double up but I have seen 6-player that double up the top 3 (not 2) players.

Other considerations seem to be that the stronger players will go to 6-player events because they get more hands in less time. Also the tight play of Sit&Go's seems to be better rewarded in 9 handed, as one gets to wait longer for hands, whereas in 6-player one might be pressured to get looser sooner.

Any thoughts?

Mike Caro

10:31 pm December 6, 2011

 
2

Hi, Warren –

All of those structures require tighter-than-usual play until you reach heads-up. Of course, in the five-players-double-up variation, there will be no heads-up (if I understand it right). That one requires even tighter play.

The above wouldn't hold true if most opponents realize this and are playing extra tight, too. Then you can probably bluff successfully.

Straight Flushes,
Mike Caro

Warren

5:32 am December 8, 2011

 
3

Thank you, Mr. Caro! BTW- You wrote a book on Baccarrat, did you not? How might I purchase a copy of that book?

Mike Caro

9:44 am December 8, 2011

 
4

I did research on baccarat, but not a book. My conclusion was that it was beatable if you counted cards and waited until the very rare times when cards remaining suggested a preponderance of ties. There were other revelations, too. But, in practice, it wasn't worth the effort.


Reply to Topic:
Sit & Go, 6 player vs. 9/10 player

GOOD! YOU'RE POSTING A MESSAGE AT POKER1. Remember…

Option 1: Click "Add a New Topic" to start your own discussion.

Option 2: Click "Reply to Post" to comment on the main topic.

Option 3: Click "Quote and Reply" to comment on any post. You may delete unnecessary parts from the quote.

NOTE: Quoting won't work with some browsers. Copy and paste, instead.

Guest Name (Required):

Post New Reply

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of:
11 + 12
   



 

Poker1 presents…

minute audio     Coming soon!

minute video     Coming soon!

MCU Dictionary of Poker

Michael Wiesenberg

≡ OPEN IT ≡   


  1. NEW: 7-low odds.
       (Making hands.)

    ≡ GO THERE ≡   


  2. NEW: 7-low odds.
       (Starting hands.)

    ≡ GO THERE ≡   


  3. 3rd hot link at Poker1.com.
       (Future use.)
    ≡ GO THERE ≡   

  4. 4th hot link at Poker1.com.
       (Future use.)
    ≡ GO THERE ≡   

  5. 5th hot link at Poker1.com.
       (Future use.)
    ≡ GO THERE ≡   

Follow Mike Caro

       on Twitter


CLICK HERE
to get free
e-mail tips
from Mike.


Poker1 home page